METABOLITE PROFILES AND ACCEPTABILITY BY CLUSTERS OF DIFFERENT KEFIR TYPES FOR SOUTH AFRICAN CONSUMERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2016.5.4.364-368Keywords:
Kefir, consumer preference, acidity, flavour compounds, diacetyl to acetaldehyde ratioAbstract
Kefir is an alternative fermented dairy product for low income South African consumers. However, it was shown that mass culturing of kefir grains leads to a loss of positive sensory attributes. Thus, this paper evaluates the chemical composition and the sensory acceptability for South African consumers of four variants of kefir (traditional kefir, mass-cultured kefir, Candi-kefir and Lacto-kefir).Results showed that all variants of kefir contained key flavour compounds: acetaldehyde (7 – 45 mg.L-1), ethanol (186 – 1774 mg.L-1), diacetyl (5 – 12 mg.L-1), ethyl acetate (1,2 – 30 mg.L-1) and acetic acid (892 – 4 490 mg.L-1); with acidity (TA: 0,85 – 0,96%; pH: 4,13 – 4,25) comparable with ranges reported in literature.
Based on the liking of flavour of the variants of kefir, three clusters of consumers (N=85) were identified using Ward’s clustering. Cluster I was negatively sensitive to acidic products as indicated by the low scores (<5,30) given for liking of flavour. For Cluster II consumers, the main driver of liking of flavour was ethanol (r = 0,963; p < 0.05), therefore giving the best score (7,5) to traditional kefir the most ‘yeasty’ variant. For cluster III, acidity was a significant driver of liking (r = 0,999; p < 0.05). Thus, less acidic kefir products obtained better consumer liking scores ranging between 7,09 and 7,63.
The results of this study add to the understanding of sensory attributes which drive consumer preference for kefir. This important information can be used by the South African dairy industry to strengthen the current market through the appropriate production of kefir.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-02-01
How to Cite
Lyvane Ntsame Affane, A., Muller, N., Van der Wijst, M., Sigge, G., & J. Britz, T. (2016). METABOLITE PROFILES AND ACCEPTABILITY BY CLUSTERS OF DIFFERENT KEFIR TYPES FOR SOUTH AFRICAN CONSUMERS. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 5(4), 364–368. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2016.5.4.364-368
Issue
Section
Food Sciences
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Armelle Lyvane Ntsame Affane, Nina Muller, Marieta Van der Wijst, Gunnar Sigge, Trevor J. Britz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers published in the Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences are published under a CC-BY licence (CC-BY 4.0). Published materials can be shared (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with specifying the author(s).