COMPARISON OF 2-DE PROTEOME MAPS OF WHEAT, RYE AND AMARANTH

Authors

  • Zdenka Gálová
  • Eva Pálenčárová
  • Milan Chňapek
  • Želmira Balažová

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.special2.7-10

Keywords:

Amaranth, buckwheat, 2-DE protein maps, celiac disease

Abstract

The protein maps of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cv. Brea; rye (Secale cereale L.), cv. Oklon and amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) cv. Plaisman were obtained by performing 2-DE over a broad pH range (pH 3-11NL) to obtain total protein profiles. Focussing on the gluten fraction, as it is the major trigger for Celiac disease, proteins were separated with a basic pI over a narrow pH range of pH 6-11. Putative identifications of proteins were determined using current literature. The overall spot pattern from wheat over pH 6-11was identified as gamma-gliadins (~ pI 8-10, Mrs 28 - 30, 000 Da), alpha/beta-gliadins (~pI 6.5-7.5, Mrs 25 - 35, 000 Da) and gluten proteins (pI 6-10, Mrs 35 - 60, 000 Da.). The rye had a higher number of abundant groups visible over a broad range (~ 6-200,000 Da, pI 4-9). Comparison of rye to wheat protein maps showed that each cereal had completely different spot patterns in the LMW region of the gels (<14,000 Da), but similarities were observed in the HMW and MMW regions. This is especially evident in the pH 6-11 gels. Amaranth has many proteins focussed between pH 3-11. Fewer proteins were observed for the pH 6-11 gel, especially in the HMW weight region of the gel. This is due to the fact that the pseudocereals are a botanically different species compared to cereal grasses, and even if they are rich in protein, unfavourable fractions are not present or are only available in small amounts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-02

How to Cite

Gálová, Z., Pálenčárová, E., Chňapek, M., & Balažová, Želmira. (2015). COMPARISON OF 2-DE PROTEOME MAPS OF WHEAT, RYE AND AMARANTH . Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 4(special issue 2 (Biotechnology), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.special2.7-10

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.