AGROCHEMICALS AFFECT THE ANTIOXIDATIVE DEFENSE POTENTIAL of COTTON PLANTS

Authors

  • Akmal Asrorov
  • Ildikó Matušíková
  • Surayyo Dalimova
  • Zdenka Gálová
  • Elvira Sultanova
  • Olga Veshkurova
  • Shavkat Salikhov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2016.5.6.505-508

Keywords:

Cotton plant, Insecticides, Peroxidase, Polyphenoloxidase, Proline, Methionine, Cysteine

Abstract

Application of insecticides used in cotton fields is often associated with secondary biotic stresses. One of possible reasons of such phenomenon is explained by decreased contents of plants’ defense components. As peroxidase (POD) and polyphenoloxidase (PPO) are typical oxidoreductase enzymes scavenging cell oxidative damage, we studied their change levels in cotton leaves in response to the application of three insecticides field experiment. Moreover, the concentration of proline (Pro), methionine (Met) and cysteine (Cys) was studied. The plants were treated with Carbophos, Lannate and Sumi-alfa in early blooming stage at commonly used doses in. Leaf samples were taken on the 10thand 13th days of the treatment. A pyrethroid insecticide Sumi-alfa appeared to negatively impact activities of both POD and PPO (P≤0.05), contrasting the other two insecticides examined. On the other hand, levels of amino acids with antioxidative properties increased after application of all three insecticides at the end of experiment. Our results show that the oxidative balance of treated plants was interrupted by insecticides (especially Sumi-alfa) with potential impact on vulnerability to secondary stresses. Effects of these insecticides on cotton should be considered and/or studied in more detail for efficient application in agriculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

Asrorov, A., Matušíková, I., Dalimova, S., Gálová, Z., Sultanova, E., Veshkurova, O., & Salikhov, S. (2016). AGROCHEMICALS AFFECT THE ANTIOXIDATIVE DEFENSE POTENTIAL of COTTON PLANTS. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 5(6), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2016.5.6.505-508

Issue

Section

Biotechnology

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>